FADE vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FADE and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FADE | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 11.18 | 292.50 | 10.97 |
| Daily change | −5.49% | 0.86% | −4.16% |
| Market cap | TRY 937.9M | TRY 96.5B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | 15.71 | — | 13.61 |
| P/B | 0.46 | 12.48 | 0.89 |
| Return on equity | 3.24% | −13.03% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 49.72% | 0.54% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FADE vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FADE (Fade Gida) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:16. Of the 15 metrics compared, FADE leads in 11 and KENT leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −5.49%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 937.9M). P/B: FADE leads (0.46 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: FADE leads (7.98 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: FADE leads (1.95 vs 11.82). Gross margin: FADE leads (15.81% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): FADE leads (14.21% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): FADE leads (6.39% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is FADE or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (15.71 vs —); by P/B, FADE trades at the lower multiple (0.46 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, FADE or KENT?
Annual net margin is 6.39% for FADE and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 3.24% for FADE and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, FADE or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 20.05 for FADE and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is 0.60 for FADE and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.