ETILR vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ETILR and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ETILR | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 7.25 | 292.50 | 10.98 |
| Daily change | 7.73% | 0.86% | −4.14% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.8B | TRY 96.5B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/B | 3.25 | 12.48 | 0.89 |
| Return on equity | −12.18% | −13.03% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 59.54% | 0.54% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ETILR vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ETILR (Etiler Gida) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:31. Of the 15 metrics compared, ETILR leads in 10 and KENT leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: ETILR leads (7.73% vs 0.86%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 1.8B). P/B: ETILR leads (3.25 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: ETILR leads (8.71 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: ETILR leads (1.37 vs 11.82). Gross margin: KENT leads (14.39% vs 5.33%). EBITDA margin (annual): ETILR leads (13.61% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): ETILR leads (−3.18% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is ETILR or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, ETILR trades at the lower multiple (3.25 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, ETILR or KENT?
Annual net margin is −3.18% for ETILR and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is −12.18% for ETILR and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, ETILR or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 60.76 for ETILR and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is 2.08 for ETILR and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.