ECILC vs KRSTL Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ECILC and KRSTL side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ECILC | KRSTL | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 63.95 | 7.96 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −6.64% | 1.27% | −6.10% |
| Market cap | TRY 43.8B | TRY 1.5B | TRY 4.3B |
| P/E | — | 4.22 | 17.25 |
| P/B | 0.68 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 2.04% | — | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | −3.08% | 17.93% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 22.02% | 88.35% | 37.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ECILC vs KRSTL Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ECILC (Eczacıbaşı İlaç) and KRSTL (Kristal Kola) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 18:01. Of the 15 metrics compared, ECILC leads in 5 and KRSTL leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: KRSTL leads (1.27% vs −6.64%). Market cap: ECILC leads (TRY 43.8B vs TRY 1.5B). P/B: KRSTL leads (0.67 vs 0.68). EV/EBITDA: KRSTL leads (3.36 vs 165.19). EV/Sales: KRSTL leads (0.80 vs 9.35). Gross margin: ECILC leads (37.83% vs 13.15%). EBITDA margin (annual): KRSTL leads (14.40% vs 11.49%). Net margin (annual): KRSTL leads (10.61% vs −20.86%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ECILC or KRSTL cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 4.22); by P/B, KRSTL trades at the lower multiple (0.68 vs 0.67).
Which is more profitable, ECILC or KRSTL?
Annual net margin is −20.86% for ECILC and 10.61% for KRSTL; return on equity is −3.08% for ECILC and 17.93% for KRSTL.
Which is more leveraged, ECILC or KRSTL?
The leverage ratio is 18.92 for ECILC and 31.32 for KRSTL; net debt/EBITDA is 1.37 for ECILC and 0.12 for KRSTL. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.