CUSAN vs ZRGYO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CUSAN and ZRGYO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | CUSAN | ZRGYO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 17.98 | 19.01 | 27.36 |
| Daily change | −6.84% | −2.06% | −3.89% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.3B | TRY 89.2B | TRY 9.7B |
| P/E | — | 12.92 | 24.19 |
| P/B | 1.79 | 0.97 | 1.18 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 0.51% | 1.36% |
| Return on equity | −38.98% | 8.54% | −1.17% |
| Free float | 25.33% | 5.43% | 38.01% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the CUSAN vs ZRGYO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CUSAN (Cuhadaroglu Metal) and ZRGYO (Ziraat GMYO) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:58. Of the 16 metrics compared, CUSAN leads in 3 and ZRGYO leads in 13.
Highlights: Daily change: ZRGYO leads (−2.06% vs −6.84%). Market cap: ZRGYO leads (TRY 89.2B vs TRY 1.3B). P/B: ZRGYO leads (0.97 vs 1.79). EV/EBITDA: ZRGYO leads (38.97 vs −35.68). EV/Sales: CUSAN leads (3.62 vs 47.03). Dividend yield: CUSAN leads (4.42% vs 0.51%). Gross margin: ZRGYO leads (71.69% vs −9.75%). EBITDA margin (annual): ZRGYO leads (63.27% vs 1.38%).
Frequently asked questions
Is CUSAN or ZRGYO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 12.92); by P/B, ZRGYO trades at the lower multiple (1.79 vs 0.97).
Which is more profitable, CUSAN or ZRGYO?
Annual net margin is −15.00% for CUSAN and 171.04% for ZRGYO; return on equity is −38.98% for CUSAN and 8.54% for ZRGYO.
Which is more leveraged, CUSAN or ZRGYO?
The leverage ratio is 89.96 for CUSAN and 18.72 for ZRGYO; net debt/EBITDA is 71.22 for CUSAN and 3.89 for ZRGYO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.