CUSAN vs TRGYO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CUSAN and TRGYO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | CUSAN | TRGYO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 17.98 | 90.05 | 27.36 |
| Daily change | −6.84% | −1.26% | −3.81% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.3B | TRY 90.1B | TRY 9.7B |
| P/E | — | 9.66 | 24.19 |
| P/B | 1.79 | 0.59 | 1.18 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 5.27% | 1.36% |
| Return on equity | −38.98% | 6.77% | −1.17% |
| Free float | 25.33% | 20.38% | 38.01% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the CUSAN vs TRGYO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CUSAN (Cuhadaroglu Metal) and TRGYO (Torunlar GMYO) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:56. Of the 14 metrics compared, CUSAN leads in 1 and TRGYO leads in 13.
Highlights: Daily change: TRGYO leads (−1.26% vs −6.84%). Market cap: TRGYO leads (TRY 90.1B vs TRY 1.3B). P/B: TRGYO leads (0.59 vs 1.79). EV/EBITDA: TRGYO leads (6.97 vs −35.68). EV/Sales: CUSAN leads (3.62 vs 9.98). Dividend yield: TRGYO leads (5.27% vs 4.42%). Gross margin: TRGYO leads (75.28% vs −9.75%). EBITDA margin (annual): TRGYO leads (50.05% vs 1.38%).
Frequently asked questions
Is CUSAN or TRGYO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 9.66); by P/B, TRGYO trades at the lower multiple (1.79 vs 0.59).
Which is more profitable, CUSAN or TRGYO?
Annual net margin is −15.00% for CUSAN and 51.70% for TRGYO; return on equity is −38.98% for CUSAN and 6.77% for TRGYO.
Which is more leveraged, CUSAN or TRGYO?
The leverage ratio is 89.96 for CUSAN and 22.02 for TRGYO; net debt/EBITDA is 71.22 for CUSAN and — for TRGYO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.