CUSAN vs HLGYO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CUSAN and HLGYO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | CUSAN | HLGYO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 17.98 | 3.88 | 27.36 |
| Daily change | −6.84% | −5.13% | −3.89% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.3B | TRY 14.9B | TRY 9.7B |
| P/E | — | 1.15 | 24.19 |
| P/B | 1.79 | 0.24 | 1.18 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 9.99% | 1.36% |
| Return on equity | −38.98% | 25.11% | −1.17% |
| Free float | 25.33% | 18.35% | 38.01% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the CUSAN vs HLGYO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CUSAN (Cuhadaroglu Metal) and HLGYO (Halk GMYO) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:55. Of the 16 metrics compared, CUSAN leads in 2 and HLGYO leads in 14.
Highlights: Daily change: HLGYO leads (−5.13% vs −6.84%). Market cap: HLGYO leads (TRY 14.9B vs TRY 1.3B). P/B: HLGYO leads (0.24 vs 1.79). EV/EBITDA: HLGYO leads (11.30 vs −35.68). EV/Sales: CUSAN leads (3.62 vs 6.68). Dividend yield: HLGYO leads (9.99% vs 4.42%). Gross margin: HLGYO leads (24.47% vs −9.75%). EBITDA margin (annual): HLGYO leads (17.29% vs 1.38%).
Frequently asked questions
Is CUSAN or HLGYO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 1.15); by P/B, HLGYO trades at the lower multiple (1.79 vs 0.24).
Which is more profitable, CUSAN or HLGYO?
Annual net margin is −15.00% for CUSAN and 80.55% for HLGYO; return on equity is −38.98% for CUSAN and 25.11% for HLGYO.
Which is more leveraged, CUSAN or HLGYO?
The leverage ratio is 89.96 for CUSAN and 36.71 for HLGYO; net debt/EBITDA is 71.22 for CUSAN and 5.67 for HLGYO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.