CUSAN vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CUSAN and GLRYH side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CUSAN | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 18.29 | 1.75 | 27.28 |
| Daily change | −5.23% | −3.85% | −4.91% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.3B | TRY 1.1B | TRY 9.7B |
| P/E | — | 2.32 | 23.04 |
| P/B | 1.79 | 0.19 | 1.13 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | — | 1.36% |
| Return on equity | −38.98% | 9.45% | −1.17% |
| Free float | 25.33% | 79.42% | 38.01% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CUSAN vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CUSAN (Cuhadaroglu Metal) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:17. Of the 14 metrics compared, CUSAN leads in 3 and GLRYH leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−3.85% vs −5.23%). Market cap: CUSAN leads (TRY 1.3B vs TRY 1.1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 1.79). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs −35.68). EV/Sales: CUSAN leads (3.62 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs −9.75%). EBITDA margin (annual): CUSAN leads (1.38% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −15.00%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CUSAN or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (1.79 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, CUSAN or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is −15.00% for CUSAN and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is −38.98% for CUSAN and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, CUSAN or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 89.96 for CUSAN and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is 71.22 for CUSAN and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.