CUSAN vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CUSAN and FROTO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CUSAN | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 18.25 | 74.60 | 27.26 |
| Daily change | −5.44% | −2.86% | −4.91% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.3B | TRY 261.8B | TRY 9.7B |
| P/E | — | 8.12 | 23.04 |
| P/B | 1.79 | 1.50 | 1.13 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 3.36% | 1.36% |
| Return on equity | −38.98% | 19.65% | −1.17% |
| Free float | 25.33% | 17.66% | 38.01% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CUSAN vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CUSAN (Cuhadaroglu Metal) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:18. Of the 16 metrics compared, CUSAN leads in 1 and FROTO leads in 15.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.86% vs −5.44%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 261.8B vs TRY 1.3B). P/B: FROTO leads (1.50 vs 1.79). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs −35.68). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 3.62). Dividend yield: CUSAN leads (4.42% vs 3.36%). Gross margin: FROTO leads (6.87% vs −9.75%). EBITDA margin (annual): FROTO leads (6.30% vs 1.38%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CUSAN or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 8.12); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (1.79 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, CUSAN or FROTO?
Annual net margin is −15.00% for CUSAN and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is −38.98% for CUSAN and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, CUSAN or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 89.96 for CUSAN and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is 71.22 for CUSAN and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.