CRFSA vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CRFSA and GLRYH side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CRFSA | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 210.80 | 1.75 | 46.50 |
| Daily change | −9.99% | −3.85% | −5.38% |
| Market cap | TRY 26.9B | TRY 1.1B | TRY 26.9B |
| P/E | — | 2.32 | 13.91 |
| P/B | −6.06 | 0.19 | 1.60 |
| Return on equity | 322.36% | 9.45% | 8.16% |
| Free float | 10.69% | 79.42% | 41.93% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CRFSA vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CRFSA (Carrefoursa) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:50. Of the 14 metrics compared, CRFSA leads in 4 and GLRYH leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−3.85% vs −9.99%). Market cap: CRFSA leads (TRY 26.9B vs TRY 1.1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs −6.06). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 21.94). EV/Sales: CRFSA leads (1.25 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 22.50%). EBITDA margin (annual): CRFSA leads (12.23% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −8.96%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CRFSA or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (−6.06 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, CRFSA or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is −8.96% for CRFSA and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is 322.36% for CRFSA and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, CRFSA or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 111.57 for CRFSA and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is 2.54 for CRFSA and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.