COSMO vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of COSMO and GLRYH side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | COSMO | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 81.15 | 1.75 | 7.34 |
| Daily change | −8.46% | −3.85% | −5.35% |
| Market cap | TRY 561.4M | TRY 1.1B | TRY 565.2M |
| P/E | — | 2.32 | 9.24 |
| P/B | 4.31 | 0.19 | 0.67 |
| Return on equity | −37.88% | 9.45% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 65.58% | 79.42% | 79.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the COSMO vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of COSMO (Cosmos Yat. Holding) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:16. Of the 14 metrics compared, COSMO leads in 2 and GLRYH leads in 12.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−3.85% vs −8.46%). Market cap: GLRYH leads (TRY 1.1B vs TRY 561.4M). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 4.31). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 9.65). EV/Sales: COSMO leads (2.65 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 25.26%). EBITDA margin (annual): COSMO leads (11.63% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −6.46%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is COSMO or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (4.31 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, COSMO or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is −6.46% for COSMO and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is −37.88% for COSMO and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, COSMO or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 53.19 for COSMO and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is 0.42 for COSMO and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.