CONSE vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CONSE and GLRYH side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CONSE | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.61 | 1.74 | 20.33 |
| Daily change | −6.94% | −4.40% | −6.75% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.2B | TRY 1B | TRY 10.7B |
| P/E | 16.96 | 2.32 | 13.09 |
| P/B | 0.62 | 0.19 | 1.03 |
| Return on equity | 3.90% | 9.45% | 4.43% |
| Free float | 48.92% | 79.42% | 26.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CONSE vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CONSE (Consus Enerji) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:48. Of the 15 metrics compared, CONSE leads in 3 and GLRYH leads in 12.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−4.40% vs −6.94%). Market cap: CONSE leads (TRY 1.2B vs TRY 1B). P/E: GLRYH leads (2.32 vs 16.96). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 0.62). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 22.77). EV/Sales: CONSE leads (7.95 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 6.55%). EBITDA margin (annual): CONSE leads (21.12% vs −42.31%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CONSE or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, GLRYH is cheaper (16.96 vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.62 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, CONSE or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is 5.48% for CONSE and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is 3.90% for CONSE and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, CONSE or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 71.98 for CONSE and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is 18.38 for CONSE and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.