CITAS vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CITAS and KENT side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CITAS | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 92.00 | 233.00 | 8.92 |
| Daily change | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Market cap | TRY 16.6B | TRY 76.9B | TRY 3.1B |
| P/E | 11.92 | — | 11.75 |
| P/B | 2.91 | 10.03 | 0.74 |
| Return on equity | 24.44% | −13.03% | −0.41% |
| Free float | 15.09% | 0.54% | 31.43% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CITAS vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CITAS (Citlekci Magazacilik Gida) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Oct 23, 2026, 07:00. Of the 13 metrics compared, CITAS leads in 10 and KENT leads in 3.
Highlights: Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 76.9B vs TRY 16.6B). P/B: CITAS leads (2.91 vs 10.03). EV/EBITDA: CITAS leads (81.15 vs 222.12). EV/Sales: CITAS leads (3.15 vs 9.50). Gross margin: CITAS leads (32.47% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): KENT leads (5.65% vs −71.65%). Net margin (annual): CITAS leads (172.07% vs −6.14%). Return on assets: CITAS leads (36.25% vs −7.29%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CITAS or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (11.92 vs —); by P/B, CITAS trades at the lower multiple (2.91 vs 10.03).
Which is more profitable, CITAS or KENT?
Annual net margin is 172.07% for CITAS and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 24.44% for CITAS and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, CITAS or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 25.86 for CITAS and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is — for CITAS and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.