CIMSA vs TUCLK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CIMSA and TUCLK side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CIMSA | TUCLK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 42.60 | 4.21 | 15.49 |
| Daily change | −0.47% | −3.66% | −5.57% |
| Market cap | TRY 40.3B | TRY 1.5B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | 9.32 | — | 24.91 |
| P/B | 1.08 | 0.34 | 1.01 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | — | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 12.50% | −7.50% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 45.08% | 79.03% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CIMSA vs TUCLK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CIMSA (Cimsa) and TUCLK (Tugcelik) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 16:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, CIMSA leads in 10 and TUCLK leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−0.47% vs −3.66%). Market cap: CIMSA leads (TRY 40.3B vs TRY 1.5B). P/B: TUCLK leads (0.34 vs 1.08). EV/EBITDA: TUCLK leads (5.62 vs 8.12). EV/Sales: CIMSA leads (2.62 vs 4.81). Gross margin: CIMSA leads (17.56% vs 13.46%). EBITDA margin (annual): TUCLK leads (45.07% vs 18.96%). Net margin (annual): CIMSA leads (9.76% vs −16.49%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CIMSA or TUCLK cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (9.32 vs —); by P/B, TUCLK trades at the lower multiple (1.08 vs 0.34).
Which is more profitable, CIMSA or TUCLK?
Annual net margin is 9.76% for CIMSA and −16.49% for TUCLK; return on equity is 12.50% for CIMSA and −7.50% for TUCLK.
Which is more leveraged, CIMSA or TUCLK?
The leverage ratio is 52.21 for CIMSA and 48.83 for TUCLK; net debt/EBITDA is 3.11 for CIMSA and 3.58 for TUCLK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.