CIMSA vs TCKRC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CIMSA and TCKRC side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CIMSA | TCKRC | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 42.52 | 119.80 | 15.54 |
| Daily change | −0.65% | −8.76% | −5.88% |
| Market cap | TRY 40.2B | TRY 20.4B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | 9.32 | 11.06 | 24.91 |
| P/B | 1.08 | 3.09 | 1.01 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | — | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 12.50% | 34.79% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 45.08% | 32.03% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CIMSA vs TCKRC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CIMSA (Cimsa) and TCKRC (Kirac Galvaniz) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:49. Of the 16 metrics compared, CIMSA leads in 6 and TCKRC leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−0.65% vs −8.76%). Market cap: CIMSA leads (TRY 40.2B vs TRY 20.4B). P/E: CIMSA leads (9.32 vs 11.06). P/B: CIMSA leads (1.08 vs 3.09). EV/EBITDA: CIMSA leads (8.12 vs 10.91). EV/Sales: CIMSA leads (2.62 vs 6.60). Gross margin: TCKRC leads (39.40% vs 17.56%). EBITDA margin (annual): TCKRC leads (41.24% vs 18.96%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CIMSA or TCKRC cheaper?
By P/E, CIMSA is cheaper (9.32 vs 11.06); by P/B, CIMSA trades at the lower multiple (1.08 vs 3.09).
Which is more profitable, CIMSA or TCKRC?
Annual net margin is 9.76% for CIMSA and 39.26% for TCKRC; return on equity is 12.50% for CIMSA and 34.79% for TCKRC.
Which is more leveraged, CIMSA or TCKRC?
The leverage ratio is 52.21 for CIMSA and 24.06 for TCKRC; net debt/EBITDA is 3.11 for CIMSA and 0.36 for TCKRC. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.