CIMSA vs QNBFK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CIMSA and QNBFK side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CIMSA | QNBFK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 42.00 | 35.22 | 15.63 |
| Daily change | −1.87% | −3.77% | −6.81% |
| Market cap | TRY 39.7B | TRY 88.1B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | 9.32 | 43.08 | 25.12 |
| P/B | 1.08 | 11.22 | 0.99 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | — | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 12.50% | 30.06% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 45.08% | 0.60% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CIMSA vs QNBFK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CIMSA (Cimsa) and QNBFK (Qnb Finansal Kiralama) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:18. Of the 7 metrics compared, CIMSA leads in 4 and QNBFK leads in 3.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−1.87% vs −3.77%). Market cap: QNBFK leads (TRY 88.1B vs TRY 39.7B). P/E: CIMSA leads (9.32 vs 43.08). P/B: CIMSA leads (1.08 vs 11.22). Net margin (annual): QNBFK leads (189.09% vs 9.76%). Return on assets: CIMSA leads (4.70% vs 3.77%). Return on equity: QNBFK leads (30.06% vs 12.50%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CIMSA or QNBFK cheaper?
By P/E, CIMSA is cheaper (9.32 vs 43.08); by P/B, CIMSA trades at the lower multiple (1.08 vs 11.22).
Which is more profitable, CIMSA or QNBFK?
Annual net margin is 9.76% for CIMSA and 189.09% for QNBFK; return on equity is 12.50% for CIMSA and 30.06% for QNBFK.
Which is more leveraged, CIMSA or QNBFK?
The leverage ratio is 52.21 for CIMSA and — for QNBFK; net debt/EBITDA is 3.11 for CIMSA and — for QNBFK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.