CIMSA vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CIMSA and GLRYH side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CIMSA | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 42.00 | 1.75 | 15.63 |
| Daily change | −1.87% | −3.85% | −6.81% |
| Market cap | TRY 39.7B | TRY 1.1B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | 9.32 | 2.32 | 25.12 |
| P/B | 1.08 | 0.19 | 0.99 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | — | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 12.50% | 9.45% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 45.08% | 79.42% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CIMSA vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CIMSA (Cimsa) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:18. Of the 15 metrics compared, CIMSA leads in 6 and GLRYH leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−1.87% vs −3.85%). Market cap: CIMSA leads (TRY 39.7B vs TRY 1.1B). P/E: GLRYH leads (2.32 vs 9.32). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 1.08). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 8.12). EV/Sales: CIMSA leads (2.62 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 17.56%). EBITDA margin (annual): CIMSA leads (18.96% vs −42.31%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CIMSA or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, GLRYH is cheaper (9.32 vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (1.08 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, CIMSA or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is 9.76% for CIMSA and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is 12.50% for CIMSA and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, CIMSA or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 52.21 for CIMSA and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is 3.11 for CIMSA and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.