CIMSA vs ARCLK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of CIMSA and ARCLK side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CIMSA | ARCLK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 42.52 | 84.90 | 15.54 |
| Daily change | −0.65% | −1.05% | −5.88% |
| Market cap | TRY 40.2B | TRY 57.4B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | 9.32 | — | 24.91 |
| P/B | 1.08 | 0.75 | 1.01 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 1.71% | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 12.50% | −4.06% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 45.08% | 17.46% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CIMSA vs ARCLK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of CIMSA (Cimsa) and ARCLK (Arçelik) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:49. Of the 16 metrics compared, CIMSA leads in 8 and ARCLK leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−0.65% vs −1.05%). Market cap: ARCLK leads (TRY 57.4B vs TRY 40.2B). P/B: ARCLK leads (0.75 vs 1.08). EV/EBITDA: CIMSA leads (8.12 vs 9.31). EV/Sales: ARCLK leads (0.90 vs 2.62). Dividend yield: ARCLK leads (1.71% vs 1.50%). Gross margin: ARCLK leads (29.57% vs 17.56%). EBITDA margin (annual): CIMSA leads (18.96% vs 14.15%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CIMSA or ARCLK cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (9.32 vs —); by P/B, ARCLK trades at the lower multiple (1.08 vs 0.75).
Which is more profitable, CIMSA or ARCLK?
Annual net margin is 9.76% for CIMSA and −0.60% for ARCLK; return on equity is 12.50% for CIMSA and −4.06% for ARCLK.
Which is more leveraged, CIMSA or ARCLK?
The leverage ratio is 52.21 for CIMSA and 86.30 for ARCLK; net debt/EBITDA is 3.11 for CIMSA and 2.78 for ARCLK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.