BLUME vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BLUME and TUPRS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BLUME | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 34.84 | 400.00 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −5.84% | −1.48% | −4.69% |
| Market cap | TRY 6.1B | TRY 770.7B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 10.75 | 18.20 |
| P/B | 11.17 | 1.72 | 1.14 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.00% | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | −15.46% | 18.20% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 55.79% | 49.42% | 37.21% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BLUME vs TUPRS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BLUME (Blume Metal Kimya) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:22. Of the 15 metrics compared, BLUME leads in 5 and TUPRS leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.48% vs −5.84%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 770.7B vs TRY 6.1B). P/B: TUPRS leads (1.72 vs 11.17). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (6.43 vs 139.65). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 29.31). Gross margin: TUPRS leads (12.69% vs 5.47%). EBITDA margin (annual): BLUME leads (12.12% vs 10.32%). Net margin (annual): TUPRS leads (7.07% vs −23.58%).
Frequently asked questions
Is BLUME or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 10.75); by P/B, TUPRS trades at the lower multiple (11.17 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, BLUME or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is −23.58% for BLUME and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is −15.46% for BLUME and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, BLUME or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 21.56 for BLUME and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is 0.19 for BLUME and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.