BINBN vs KCHOL Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BINBN and KCHOL side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BINBN | KCHOL | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 81.70 | 212.60 | 26.00 |
| Daily change | 1.74% | −1.80% | −5.18% |
| Market cap | TRY 9.2B | TRY 539.1B | TRY 3.5B |
| P/E | — | 14.46 | 16.47 |
| P/B | 4.89 | 0.69 | 2.62 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.68% | 1.95% |
| Return on equity | −39.95% | 5.29% | 4.43% |
| Free float | 15.18% | 26.34% | 38.56% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BINBN vs KCHOL comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BINBN (Bin Ulaşım Teknolojileri) and KCHOL (Koç Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:52. Of the 14 metrics compared, BINBN leads in 6 and KCHOL leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: BINBN leads (1.74% vs −1.80%). Market cap: KCHOL leads (TRY 539.1B vs TRY 9.2B). P/B: KCHOL leads (0.69 vs 4.89). EV/EBITDA: KCHOL leads (22.31 vs −28.16). EV/Sales: KCHOL leads (1.35 vs 33.27). Gross margin: BINBN leads (24.96% vs 16.82%). EBITDA margin (annual): KCHOL leads (6.52% vs −49.98%). Net margin (annual): KCHOL leads (1.91% vs −167.62%).
Frequently asked questions
Is BINBN or KCHOL cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 14.46); by P/B, KCHOL trades at the lower multiple (4.89 vs 0.69).
Which is more profitable, BINBN or KCHOL?
Annual net margin is −167.62% for BINBN and 1.91% for KCHOL; return on equity is −39.95% for BINBN and 5.29% for KCHOL.
Which is more leveraged, BINBN or KCHOL?
The leverage ratio is 14.60 for BINBN and 79.27 for KCHOL; net debt/EBITDA is — for BINBN and 8.07 for KCHOL. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.