BARMA vs PCILT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BARMA and PCILT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BARMA | PCILT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 6.90 | 29.90 | 16.22 |
| Daily change | −7.13% | −2.61% | −4.37% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.8B | TRY 3.5B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/E | — | 6.90 | 6.90 |
| P/B | 0.39 | 1.42 | 1.28 |
| Dividend yield | — | 8.49% | 2.52% |
| Return on equity | −1.04% | 25.01% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 35.65% | 34.99% | 34.99% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BARMA vs PCILT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BARMA (Barem Ambalaj) and PCILT (Pc İletişim Medya) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 14 metrics compared, BARMA leads in 3 and PCILT leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: PCILT leads (−2.61% vs −7.13%). Market cap: PCILT leads (TRY 3.5B vs TRY 1.8B). P/B: BARMA leads (0.39 vs 1.42). EV/EBITDA: PCILT leads (4.10 vs 15.80). EV/Sales: PCILT leads (0.42 vs 3.61). Gross margin: BARMA leads (13.25% vs 8.12%). EBITDA margin (annual): BARMA leads (16.73% vs 5.45%). Net margin (annual): PCILT leads (4.72% vs −1.04%).
Frequently asked questions
Is BARMA or PCILT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 6.90); by P/B, BARMA trades at the lower multiple (0.39 vs 1.42).
Which is more profitable, BARMA or PCILT?
Annual net margin is −1.04% for BARMA and 4.72% for PCILT; return on equity is −1.04% for BARMA and 25.01% for PCILT.
Which is more leveraged, BARMA or PCILT?
The leverage ratio is 68.28 for BARMA and 53.71 for PCILT; net debt/EBITDA is 9.76 for BARMA and −1.87 for PCILT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.