BAKAB vs ZRGYO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of BAKAB and ZRGYO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BAKAB | ZRGYO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 32.10 | 19.01 | 16.22 |
| Daily change | −6.85% | −2.06% | −4.30% |
| Market cap | TRY 2.3B | TRY 89.2B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/E | — | 12.92 | 6.90 |
| P/B | 0.76 | 0.97 | 1.28 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.51% | 2.52% |
| Return on equity | −0.27% | 8.54% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 16.28% | 5.43% | 34.99% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BAKAB vs ZRGYO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of BAKAB (Bak Ambalaj) and ZRGYO (Ziraat GMYO) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:58. Of the 15 metrics compared, BAKAB leads in 6 and ZRGYO leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: ZRGYO leads (−2.06% vs −6.85%). Market cap: ZRGYO leads (TRY 89.2B vs TRY 2.3B). P/B: BAKAB leads (0.76 vs 0.97). EV/EBITDA: BAKAB leads (9.81 vs 38.97). EV/Sales: BAKAB leads (0.87 vs 47.03). Gross margin: ZRGYO leads (71.69% vs 10.48%). EBITDA margin (annual): ZRGYO leads (63.27% vs 7.17%). Net margin (annual): ZRGYO leads (171.04% vs −0.13%).
Frequently asked questions
Is BAKAB or ZRGYO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 12.92); by P/B, BAKAB trades at the lower multiple (0.76 vs 0.97).
Which is more profitable, BAKAB or ZRGYO?
Annual net margin is −0.13% for BAKAB and 171.04% for ZRGYO; return on equity is −0.27% for BAKAB and 8.54% for ZRGYO.
Which is more leveraged, BAKAB or ZRGYO?
The leverage ratio is 53.05 for BAKAB and 18.72 for ZRGYO; net debt/EBITDA is 1.43 for BAKAB and 3.89 for ZRGYO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.