AVPGY vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of AVPGY and FROTO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AVPGY | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 51.20 | 74.90 | 6.64 |
| Daily change | −3.94% | −2.47% | −4.47% |
| Market cap | TRY 20.5B | TRY 262.8B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | 16.29 | 8.12 | 6.99 |
| P/B | 0.46 | 1.50 | 0.42 |
| Dividend yield | 4.21% | 3.36% | 1.34% |
| Return on equity | 3.05% | 19.65% | 0.92% |
| Free float | 19.96% | 17.66% | 28.00% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AVPGY vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of AVPGY (Avrupakent GMYO) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:59. Of the 14 metrics compared, AVPGY leads in 8 and FROTO leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.47% vs −3.94%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 262.8B vs TRY 20.5B). P/E: FROTO leads (8.12 vs 16.29). P/B: AVPGY leads (0.46 vs 1.50). EV/Sales: AVPGY leads (0.56 vs 0.89). Dividend yield: AVPGY leads (4.21% vs 3.36%). Gross margin: AVPGY leads (45.47% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): FROTO leads (6.30% vs 0.66%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AVPGY or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, FROTO is cheaper (16.29 vs 8.12); by P/B, AVPGY trades at the lower multiple (0.46 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, AVPGY or FROTO?
Annual net margin is 20.22% for AVPGY and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is 3.05% for AVPGY and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, AVPGY or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 20.16 for AVPGY and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is — for AVPGY and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.