ATATP vs UMPAS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ATATP and UMPAS side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ATATP | UMPAS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 190.80 | 9.30 | 23.24 |
| Daily change | −4.74% | 0.00% | 0.45% |
| Market cap | TRY 17.9B | TRY 390.6M | TRY 3.1B |
| P/E | 7.53 | — | 13.69 |
| P/B | 2.52 | 0.21 | 2.02 |
| Dividend yield | 0.40% | — | 1.95% |
| Return on equity | 38.59% | −17.23% | 6.43% |
| Free float | 19.11% | 45.79% | 38.50% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ATATP vs UMPAS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ATATP (Atp Yazilim) and UMPAS (Umpas Holding) side by side as of Nov 13, 2026, 18:19. Of the 9 metrics compared, ATATP leads in 7 and UMPAS leads in 2.
Highlights: Daily change: UMPAS leads (0.00% vs −4.74%). Market cap: ATATP leads (TRY 17.9B vs TRY 390.6M). P/B: UMPAS leads (0.21 vs 2.52). EV/EBITDA: ATATP leads (4.58 vs −145.11). Return on assets: ATATP leads (22.79% vs −22.60%). Return on equity: ATATP leads (38.59% vs −17.23%). Current ratio: ATATP leads (2.27 vs 0.02). Quick ratio: ATATP leads (2.22 vs 0.02).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ATATP or UMPAS cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (7.53 vs —); by P/B, UMPAS trades at the lower multiple (2.52 vs 0.21).
Which is more profitable, ATATP or UMPAS?
Annual net margin is 44.11% for ATATP and — for UMPAS; return on equity is 38.59% for ATATP and −17.23% for UMPAS.
Which is more leveraged, ATATP or UMPAS?
The leverage ratio is 7.21 for ATATP and 34.43 for UMPAS; net debt/EBITDA is — for ATATP and — for UMPAS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.