ATATP vs SMART Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ATATP and SMART side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ATATP | SMART | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 205.50 | 9.64 | 20.16 |
| Daily change | −3.70% | −3.02% | −1.51% |
| Market cap | TRY 19.3B | TRY 307.2M | TRY 2.7B |
| P/E | 8.57 | — | 12.35 |
| P/B | 3.12 | 0.62 | 1.72 |
| Dividend yield | 0.40% | — | 1.95% |
| Return on equity | 45.25% | −9.10% | 5.45% |
| Free float | 19.20% | 93.23% | 38.51% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ATATP vs SMART Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ATATP (Atp Yazilim) and SMART (Smartiks Yazilim) side by side as of Nov 2, 2026, 18:19. Of the 13 metrics compared, ATATP leads in 9 and SMART leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: SMART leads (−3.02% vs −3.70%). Market cap: ATATP leads (TRY 19.3B vs TRY 307.2M). P/B: SMART leads (0.62 vs 3.12). EV/EBITDA: ATATP leads (4.99 vs 6.20). EV/Sales: SMART leads (3.92 vs 5.35). Gross margin: ATATP leads (87.28% vs 78.51%). EBITDA margin (annual): SMART leads (51.21% vs 6.79%). Net margin (annual): ATATP leads (41.91% vs −32.00%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ATATP or SMART cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (8.57 vs —); by P/B, SMART trades at the lower multiple (3.12 vs 0.62).
Which is more profitable, ATATP or SMART?
Annual net margin is 41.91% for ATATP and −32.00% for SMART; return on equity is 45.25% for ATATP and −9.10% for SMART.
Which is more leveraged, ATATP or SMART?
The leverage ratio is 6.92 for ATATP and 47.56 for SMART; net debt/EBITDA is — for ATATP and 1.71 for SMART. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.