ATATP vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ATATP and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ATATP | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 230.10 | 292.50 | 25.78 |
| Daily change | −5.74% | 0.86% | −5.05% |
| Market cap | TRY 21.6B | TRY 96.5B | TRY 3.5B |
| P/E | 9.80 | — | 16.47 |
| P/B | 3.57 | 12.48 | 2.62 |
| Dividend yield | 0.40% | — | 1.95% |
| Return on equity | 45.25% | −13.03% | 4.43% |
| Free float | 19.33% | 0.54% | 38.56% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ATATP vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ATATP (Atp Yazilim) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:22. Of the 13 metrics compared, ATATP leads in 11 and KENT leads in 2.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −5.74%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 21.6B). P/B: ATATP leads (3.57 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: ATATP leads (5.72 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: ATATP leads (6.14 vs 11.82). Gross margin: ATATP leads (87.28% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): ATATP leads (7.04% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): ATATP leads (41.91% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is ATATP or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (9.80 vs —); by P/B, ATATP trades at the lower multiple (3.57 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, ATATP or KENT?
Annual net margin is 41.91% for ATATP and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 45.25% for ATATP and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, ATATP or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 6.92 for ATATP and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is — for ATATP and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.