ARZUM vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ARZUM and FROTO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ARZUM | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.14 | 74.45 | 17.99 |
| Daily change | −1.72% | −0.67% | −0.97% |
| Market cap | TRY 684M | TRY 261.3B | TRY 3.4B |
| P/E | — | 7.92 | 14.72 |
| P/B | −1.34 | 1.47 | 1.06 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 533.99% | 19.65% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 66.78% | 17.64% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ARZUM vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ARZUM (Arzum Ev Aletleri) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 29, 2026, 15:58. Of the 15 metrics compared, ARZUM leads in 3 and FROTO leads in 12.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−0.67% vs −1.72%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 261.3B vs TRY 684M). P/B: FROTO leads (1.47 vs −1.34). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.03 vs −6.30). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.88 vs 0.94). Gross margin: ARZUM leads (31.43% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): ARZUM leads (8.52% vs 6.30%). Net margin (annual): FROTO leads (4.28% vs −28.80%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ARZUM or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 7.92); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (−1.34 vs 1.47).
Which is more profitable, ARZUM or FROTO?
Annual net margin is −28.80% for ARZUM and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is 533.99% for ARZUM and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, ARZUM or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 116.44 for ARZUM and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is 4.89 for ARZUM and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.