ARCLK vs LKMNH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ARCLK and LKMNH side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ARCLK | LKMNH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 85.25 | 11.59 | 20.71 |
| Daily change | −0.64% | −3.82% | −4.10% |
| Market cap | TRY 57.6B | TRY 2.5B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | — | 22.31 | 16.24 |
| P/B | 0.75 | 1.02 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 1.52% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | −4.06% | 5.00% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.46% | 65.60% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ARCLK vs LKMNH comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ARCLK (Arçelik) and LKMNH (Lokman Hekim Sağlık) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:23. Of the 16 metrics compared, ARCLK leads in 8 and LKMNH leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: ARCLK leads (−0.64% vs −3.82%). Market cap: ARCLK leads (TRY 57.6B vs TRY 2.5B). P/B: ARCLK leads (0.75 vs 1.02). EV/EBITDA: LKMNH leads (5.16 vs 9.31). EV/Sales: ARCLK leads (0.90 vs 2.06). Dividend yield: ARCLK leads (1.71% vs 1.52%). Gross margin: ARCLK leads (29.57% vs 18.25%). EBITDA margin (annual): LKMNH leads (23.92% vs 14.15%).
Frequently asked questions
Is ARCLK or LKMNH cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 22.31); by P/B, ARCLK trades at the lower multiple (0.75 vs 1.02).
Which is more profitable, ARCLK or LKMNH?
Annual net margin is −0.60% for ARCLK and 2.79% for LKMNH; return on equity is −4.06% for ARCLK and 5.00% for LKMNH.
Which is more leveraged, ARCLK or LKMNH?
The leverage ratio is 86.30 for ARCLK and 57.87 for LKMNH; net debt/EBITDA is 2.78 for ARCLK and 2.46 for LKMNH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.