ARCLK vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ARCLK and CIMSA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ARCLK | CIMSA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 84.75 | 42.52 | 20.19 |
| Daily change | −1.22% | −0.65% | −5.86% |
| Market cap | TRY 57.3B | TRY 40.2B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | — | 9.32 | 15.47 |
| P/B | 0.75 | 1.08 | 1.09 |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 1.50% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | −4.06% | 12.50% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.46% | 45.08% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ARCLK vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ARCLK (Arçelik) and CIMSA (Cimsa) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:48. Of the 16 metrics compared, ARCLK leads in 8 and CIMSA leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−0.65% vs −1.22%). Market cap: ARCLK leads (TRY 57.3B vs TRY 40.2B). P/B: ARCLK leads (0.75 vs 1.08). EV/EBITDA: CIMSA leads (8.12 vs 9.31). EV/Sales: ARCLK leads (0.90 vs 2.62). Dividend yield: ARCLK leads (1.71% vs 1.50%). Gross margin: ARCLK leads (29.57% vs 17.56%). EBITDA margin (annual): CIMSA leads (18.96% vs 14.15%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ARCLK or CIMSA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 9.32); by P/B, ARCLK trades at the lower multiple (0.75 vs 1.08).
Which is more profitable, ARCLK or CIMSA?
Annual net margin is −0.60% for ARCLK and 9.76% for CIMSA; return on equity is −4.06% for ARCLK and 12.50% for CIMSA.
Which is more leveraged, ARCLK or CIMSA?
The leverage ratio is 86.30 for ARCLK and 52.21 for CIMSA; net debt/EBITDA is 2.78 for ARCLK and 3.11 for CIMSA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.