AHSGY vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of AHSGY and GUBRF side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | AHSGY | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 9.59 | 437.50 | 6.80 |
| Daily change | −9.95% | −4.48% | −3.49% |
| Market cap | TRY 6.9B | TRY 146.1B | TRY 5.6B |
| P/E | 2.17 | 19.22 | 7.35 |
| P/B | 0.72 | 3.89 | 0.45 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | — | 1.34% |
| Return on equity | 40.13% | 23.87% | 0.92% |
| Free float | 15.24% | 20.28% | 28.00% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the AHSGY vs GUBRF comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of AHSGY (Ahes GMYO) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:19. Of the 14 metrics compared, AHSGY leads in 10 and GUBRF leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: GUBRF leads (−4.48% vs −9.95%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 146.1B vs TRY 6.9B). P/E: AHSGY leads (2.17 vs 19.22). P/B: AHSGY leads (0.72 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: GUBRF leads (11.70 vs 17.68). EV/Sales: GUBRF leads (3.90 vs 77.03). Gross margin: AHSGY leads (92.97% vs 26.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): AHSGY leads (902.01% vs 22.84%).
Frequently asked questions
Is AHSGY or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, AHSGY is cheaper (2.17 vs 19.22); by P/B, AHSGY trades at the lower multiple (0.72 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, AHSGY or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is 719.62% for AHSGY and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is 40.13% for AHSGY and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, AHSGY or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 22.61 for AHSGY and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is — for AHSGY and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.