ACSEL vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ACSEL and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ACSEL | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 87.60 | 292.50 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −3.84% | 0.86% | −4.81% |
| Market cap | TRY 939.2M | TRY 96.5B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/B | 1.45 | 12.48 | 1.14 |
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | — | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | −1.04% | −13.03% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 48.34% | 0.54% | 37.21% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ACSEL vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ACSEL (Acipayam Seluloz) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:20. Of the 15 metrics compared, ACSEL leads in 8 and KENT leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −3.84%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 939.2M). P/B: ACSEL leads (1.45 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: ACSEL leads (11.20 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: ACSEL leads (2.60 vs 11.82). Gross margin: KENT leads (14.39% vs 12.43%). EBITDA margin (annual): ACSEL leads (13.29% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): ACSEL leads (−0.80% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is ACSEL or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, ACSEL trades at the lower multiple (1.45 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, ACSEL or KENT?
Annual net margin is −0.80% for ACSEL and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is −1.04% for ACSEL and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, ACSEL or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 36.63 for ACSEL and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is 1.30 for ACSEL and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.