Yatırımcı.AI

TEJ vs ZCN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of TEJ (Azimut Portföy Teknoloji Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ZCN (Ziraat Portföy Emtia Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

TEJZCN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

TEJ vs ZCN Fund Comparison
MetricTEJZCNCategory median
Daily1.40%−0.25%0.39%
1 week3.36%−1.08%0.25%
1 month1.89%−0.06%−1.05%
3 months8.45%12.81%6.44%
6 months47.73%13.33%13.81%
YTD51.69%24.59%22.40%
1 year61.20%39.27%35.81%
3 years18.84%172.22%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the TEJ vs ZCN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of TEJ (Azimut Portföy Teknoloji Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ZCN (Ziraat Portföy Emtia Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, TEJ leads in 7 and ZCN leads in 3. TEJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZCN is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TEJ leads (1.40% vs −0.25%). 1 week: TEJ leads (3.36% vs −1.08%). 1 month: TEJ leads (1.89% vs −0.06%). 3 months: ZCN leads (12.81% vs 8.45%). 6 months: TEJ leads (47.73% vs 13.33%). YTD: TEJ leads (51.69% vs 24.59%). 1 year: TEJ leads (61.20% vs 39.27%). 3 years: ZCN leads (172.22% vs 18.84%). Size (TRY): TEJ leads (689.7M vs 584.7M). Investors: ZCN leads (6,111 vs 1,215).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date TEJ returned 51.69% and ZCN returned 24.59%; over the last year TEJ returned 61.20% and ZCN returned 39.27%. Over the last month TEJ returned 1.89% and ZCN returned −0.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, TEJ has a size of TRY 689.7M with 1,215 investors, while ZCN has a size of TRY 584.7M with 6,111 investors. TEJ leads in size and ZCN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of TEJ is 6 out of 7 and that of ZCN is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.