Yatırımcı.AI

RPT vs ZCD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RPT (Rota Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZCD (Ziraat Portföy Altıncı Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

RPTZCD
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

RPT vs ZCD Fund Comparison
MetricRPTZCDCategory median
Daily0.26%1.18%0.19%
1 week0.67%−4.17%0.42%
1 month2.54%−7.92%0.94%
3 months9.25%−4.85%5.89%
6 months20.68%12.21%12.86%
YTD31.33%6.99%18.07%
1 year45.21%13.22%24.44%
3 years262.72%200.54%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the RPT vs ZCD comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RPT (Rota Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZCD (Ziraat Portföy Altıncı Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, RPT leads in 8 and ZCD leads in 3. RPT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZCD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZCD leads (1.18% vs 0.26%). 1 week: RPT leads (0.67% vs −4.17%). 1 month: RPT leads (2.54% vs −7.92%). 3 months: RPT leads (9.25% vs −4.85%). 6 months: RPT leads (20.68% vs 12.21%). YTD: RPT leads (31.33% vs 6.99%). 1 year: RPT leads (45.21% vs 13.22%). 3 years: RPT leads (262.72% vs 200.54%). Size (TRY): ZCD leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: ZCD leads (412 vs 136). Risk: RPT leads (1 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date RPT returned 31.33% and ZCD returned 6.99%; over the last year RPT returned 45.21% and ZCD returned 13.22%. Over the last month RPT returned 2.54% and ZCD returned −7.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, RPT has a size of TRY 1.2B with 136 investors, while ZCD has a size of TRY 1.2B with 412 investors. ZCD leads in size and ZCD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RPT is 1 out of 7 and that of ZCD is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.