NZH vs VVM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NZH (Neo Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and VVM (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | NZH | VVM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −3.25% | — | −2.35% |
| Daily | 0.64% | 0.26% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | 0.16% | 0.66% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −5.80% | 1.69% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | 1.09% | 7.81% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 10.85% | 19.60% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 22.53% | 29.78% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | 32.55% | 42.96% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | 91.58% | 239.10% | 161.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the NZH vs VVM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of NZH (Neo Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and VVM (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, NZH leads in 2 and VVM leads in 9. NZH is a Variable Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VVM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NZH leads (0.64% vs 0.26%). 1 week: VVM leads (0.66% vs 0.16%). 1 month: VVM leads (1.69% vs −5.80%). 3 months: VVM leads (7.81% vs 1.09%). 6 months: VVM leads (19.60% vs 10.85%). YTD: VVM leads (29.78% vs 22.53%). 1 year: VVM leads (42.96% vs 32.55%). 3 years: VVM leads (239.10% vs 91.58%). Size (TRY): NZH leads (446.3M vs 430.8M). Investors: VVM leads (7,001 vs 256). Risk: VVM leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, NZH or VVM?
Year to date NZH returned 22.53% and VVM returned 29.78%; over the last year NZH returned 32.55% and VVM returned 42.96%. Over the last month NZH returned −5.80% and VVM returned 1.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, NZH or VVM?
As of September 28, 2026, NZH has a size of TRY 446.3M with 256 investors, while VVM has a size of TRY 430.8M with 7,001 investors. NZH leads in size and VVM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of NZH and VVM mean?
The CMB risk score of NZH is 6 out of 7 and that of VVM is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.