Yatırımcı.AI

NJF vs PDD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NJF (Nurol Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and PDD (Astra Portföy Katılım Fonu) side by side.

NJFPDD
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

NJF vs PDD Fund Comparison
MetricNJFPDDCategory median
Daily0.58%0.03%0.29%
1 week−1.65%0.18%0.41%
1 month−4.06%1.38%0.20%
3 months10.05%6.89%8.83%
6 months5.07%16.99%16.56%
YTD13.64%25.86%27.81%
1 year33.52%35.68%39.52%
3 years320.90%177.09%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the NJF vs PDD comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NJF (Nurol Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and PDD (Astra Portföy Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, NJF leads in 4 and PDD leads in 7. NJF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PDD is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Qınvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NJF leads (0.58% vs 0.03%). 1 week: PDD leads (0.18% vs −1.65%). 1 month: PDD leads (1.38% vs −4.06%). 3 months: NJF leads (10.05% vs 6.89%). 6 months: PDD leads (16.99% vs 5.07%). YTD: PDD leads (25.86% vs 13.64%). 1 year: PDD leads (35.68% vs 33.52%). 3 years: NJF leads (320.90% vs 177.09%). Size (TRY): PDD leads (819.4M vs 809.2M). Investors: NJF leads (1,477 vs 154). Risk: PDD leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date NJF returned 13.64% and PDD returned 25.86%; over the last year NJF returned 33.52% and PDD returned 35.68%. Over the last month NJF returned −4.06% and PDD returned 1.38%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, NJF has a size of TRY 809.2M with 1,477 investors, while PDD has a size of TRY 819.4M with 154 investors. PDD leads in size and NJF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NJF is 6 out of 7 and that of PDD is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.