MZP vs TPC Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MZP (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TPC (Teb Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | MZP | TPC | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.39% |
| 1 week | 0.29% | −2.52% | 0.25% |
| 1 month | −1.52% | −4.82% | −1.05% |
| 3 months | 4.53% | 9.23% | 6.44% |
| 6 months | 11.47% | 2.95% | 13.81% |
| YTD | 22.69% | 3.42% | 22.40% |
| 1 year | 32.84% | 26.31% | 35.81% |
| 3 years | 180.60% | 171.75% | 175.03% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the MZP vs TPC Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MZP (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TPC (Teb Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, MZP leads in 10 and TPC leads in 1. MZP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; TPC is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MZP leads (0.40% vs 0.28%). 1 week: MZP leads (0.29% vs −2.52%). 1 month: MZP leads (−1.52% vs −4.82%). 3 months: TPC leads (9.23% vs 4.53%). 6 months: MZP leads (11.47% vs 2.95%). YTD: MZP leads (22.69% vs 3.42%). 1 year: MZP leads (32.84% vs 26.31%). 3 years: MZP leads (180.60% vs 171.75%). Size (TRY): MZP leads (5.7B vs 5.4B). Investors: MZP leads (123,085 vs 11,056). Risk: MZP leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, MZP or TPC?
Year to date MZP returned 22.69% and TPC returned 3.42%; over the last year MZP returned 32.84% and TPC returned 26.31%. Over the last month MZP returned −1.52% and TPC returned −4.82%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MZP or TPC?
As of September 28, 2026, MZP has a size of TRY 5.7B with 123,085 investors, while TPC has a size of TRY 5.4B with 11,056 investors. MZP leads in size and MZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MZP and TPC mean?
The CMB risk score of MZP is 5 out of 7 and that of TPC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.