MTK vs NUH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MTK (Mt Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and NUH (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Hisse Senedi Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | MTK | NUH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −3.66% | −4.30% | −2.50% |
| Daily | −2.26% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
| 1 week | −10.95% | −0.13% | −0.04% |
| 1 month | −18.68% | −8.79% | −5.83% |
| 3 months | 0.67% | −8.01% | −2.72% |
| 6 months | 8.60% | 15.12% | 8.69% |
| YTD | 26.49% | 25.51% | 19.95% |
| 1 year | 26.74% | — | 22.69% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the MTK vs NUH comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MTK (Mt Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and NUH (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Hisse Senedi Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, MTK leads in 5 and NUH leads in 4. MTK is a Stock Fund fund managed by Mt Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NUH is a Stock Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Today (est.): MTK leads (−3.66% vs −4.30%). Daily: NUH leads (0.08% vs −2.26%). 1 week: NUH leads (−0.13% vs −10.95%). 1 month: NUH leads (−8.79% vs −18.68%). 3 months: MTK leads (0.67% vs −8.01%). 6 months: NUH leads (15.12% vs 8.60%). YTD: MTK leads (26.49% vs 25.51%). Size (TRY): MTK leads (45.1M vs 41.9M). Investors: MTK leads (674 vs 614).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, MTK or NUH?
Year to date MTK returned 26.49% and NUH returned 25.51%; over the last year MTK returned 26.74% and NUH returned —. Over the last month MTK returned −18.68% and NUH returned −8.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MTK or NUH?
As of September 28, 2026, MTK has a size of TRY 45.1M with 674 investors, while NUH has a size of TRY 41.9M with 614 investors. MTK leads in size and MTK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MTK and NUH mean?
The CMB risk score of MTK is 6 out of 7 and that of NUH is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.