Yatırımcı.AI

MPE vs RBK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MPE (Mt Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and RBK (Albaraka Portföy Katılım Fonu) side by side.

MPERBK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

MPE vs RBK Fund Comparison
MetricMPERBKCategory median
Daily0.22%0.05%0.29%
1 week0.51%0.24%0.41%
1 month2.76%1.57%0.20%
3 months5.07%6.60%8.83%
6 months15.68%14.89%16.56%
YTD25.52%18.57%27.81%
1 year38.12%26.94%39.52%
3 years—136.03%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the MPE vs RBK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MPE (Mt Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and RBK (Albaraka Portföy Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, MPE leads in 8 and RBK leads in 2. MPE is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Mt Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RBK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Albaraka Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MPE leads (0.22% vs 0.05%). 1 week: MPE leads (0.51% vs 0.24%). 1 month: MPE leads (2.76% vs 1.57%). 3 months: RBK leads (6.60% vs 5.07%). 6 months: MPE leads (15.68% vs 14.89%). YTD: MPE leads (25.52% vs 18.57%). 1 year: MPE leads (38.12% vs 26.94%). Size (TRY): MPE leads (34.7M vs 34.2M). Investors: RBK leads (1,113 vs 100). Risk: MPE leads (1 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date MPE returned 25.52% and RBK returned 18.57%; over the last year MPE returned 38.12% and RBK returned 26.94%. Over the last month MPE returned 2.76% and RBK returned 1.57%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, MPE has a size of TRY 34.7M with 100 investors, while RBK has a size of TRY 34.2M with 1,113 investors. MPE leads in size and RBK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MPE is 1 out of 7 and that of RBK is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.