Yatırımcı.AI

MJB vs ZSG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MJB (Aktif Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ZSG (Ziraat Portföy ESG Sürdürülebilirlik Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

MJBZSG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

MJB vs ZSG Fund Comparison
MetricMJBZSGCategory median
Daily0.31%0.41%0.39%
1 week−0.31%0.44%0.25%
1 month−3.25%−0.04%−1.05%
3 months−0.52%2.30%6.44%
6 months13.36%16.10%13.81%
YTD27.88%25.46%22.40%
1 year35.62%33.72%35.81%
3 years177.78%138.54%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the MJB vs ZSG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MJB (Aktif Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and ZSG (Ziraat Portföy ESG Sürdürülebilirlik Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, MJB leads in 4 and ZSG leads in 6. MJB is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZSG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZSG leads (0.41% vs 0.31%). 1 week: ZSG leads (0.44% vs −0.31%). 1 month: ZSG leads (−0.04% vs −3.25%). 3 months: ZSG leads (2.30% vs −0.52%). 6 months: ZSG leads (16.10% vs 13.36%). YTD: MJB leads (27.88% vs 25.46%). 1 year: MJB leads (35.62% vs 33.72%). 3 years: MJB leads (177.78% vs 138.54%). Size (TRY): MJB leads (49.4M vs 49.2M). Investors: ZSG leads (859 vs 732).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date MJB returned 27.88% and ZSG returned 25.46%; over the last year MJB returned 35.62% and ZSG returned 33.72%. Over the last month MJB returned −3.25% and ZSG returned −0.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, MJB has a size of TRY 49.4M with 732 investors, while ZSG has a size of TRY 49.2M with 859 investors. MJB leads in size and ZSG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MJB is 6 out of 7 and that of ZSG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.