Yatırımcı.AI

MBL vs RTD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MBL (Meksa Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and RTD (Re-Pıe Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) side by side.

MBLRTD
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

MBL vs RTD Fund Comparison
MetricMBLRTDCategory median
Today (est.)—−2.98%−1.86%
Daily0.29%1.17%0.32%
1 week0.67%3.86%0.42%
1 month2.98%−0.37%−1.48%
3 months9.45%3.96%4.48%
6 months20.50%42.34%14.82%
YTD30.60%49.96%25.33%
1 year43.89%50.71%35.72%
3 years238.12%1.09%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 12:34.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the MBL vs RTD comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MBL (Meksa Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and RTD (Re-Pıe Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, MBL leads in 5 and RTD leads in 6. MBL is a Variable Fund fund managed by Meksa Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RTD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Re-Pıe Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RTD leads (1.17% vs 0.29%). 1 week: RTD leads (3.86% vs 0.67%). 1 month: MBL leads (2.98% vs −0.37%). 3 months: MBL leads (9.45% vs 3.96%). 6 months: RTD leads (42.34% vs 20.50%). YTD: RTD leads (49.96% vs 30.60%). 1 year: RTD leads (50.71% vs 43.89%). 3 years: MBL leads (238.12% vs 1.09%). Size (TRY): MBL leads (21.4M vs 18.7M). Investors: RTD leads (329 vs 195). Risk: MBL leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date MBL returned 30.60% and RTD returned 49.96%; over the last year MBL returned 43.89% and RTD returned 50.71%. Over the last month MBL returned 2.98% and RTD returned −0.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, MBL has a size of TRY 21.4M with 195 investors, while RTD has a size of TRY 18.7M with 329 investors. MBL leads in size and RTD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MBL is 2 out of 7 and that of RTD is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.