Yatırımcı.AI

KUD vs MPK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KUD (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dinamik Katılım Fonu) and MPK (Aktif Portföy Kira Sertifikası Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.

KUDMPK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KUD vs MPK Fund Comparison
MetricKUDMPKCategory median
Daily0.87%0.16%0.29%
1 week−0.11%0.52%0.41%
1 month−1.52%2.80%0.20%
3 months5.68%9.29%8.83%
6 months23.91%19.99%16.56%
YTD41.62%30.28%27.81%
1 year47.42%43.24%39.52%
3 years—228.97%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the KUD vs MPK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KUD (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dinamik Katılım Fonu) and MPK (Aktif Portföy Kira Sertifikası Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KUD leads in 5 and MPK leads in 5. KUD is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MPK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KUD leads (0.87% vs 0.16%). 1 week: MPK leads (0.52% vs −0.11%). 1 month: MPK leads (2.80% vs −1.52%). 3 months: MPK leads (9.29% vs 5.68%). 6 months: KUD leads (23.91% vs 19.99%). YTD: KUD leads (41.62% vs 30.28%). 1 year: KUD leads (47.42% vs 43.24%). Size (TRY): MPK leads (260.4M vs 257.5M). Investors: KUD leads (2,656 vs 1,436). Risk: MPK leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KUD returned 41.62% and MPK returned 30.28%; over the last year KUD returned 47.42% and MPK returned 43.24%. Over the last month KUD returned −1.52% and MPK returned 2.80%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KUD has a size of TRY 257.5M with 2,656 investors, while MPK has a size of TRY 260.4M with 1,436 investors. MPK leads in size and KUD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KUD is 3 out of 7 and that of MPK is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.