Yatırımcı.AI

IHT vs TLZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IHT (İş Portföy İhracatçı Şirketler Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and TLZ (Ata Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) side by side.

IHTTLZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IHT vs TLZ Fund Comparison
MetricIHTTLZCategory median
Today (est.)−2.54%−3.11%−2.94%
Daily0.34%1.04%0.47%
1 week−0.40%0.34%−0.04%
1 month−5.81%−10.23%−5.83%
3 months−3.75%−0.23%−2.72%
6 months3.65%14.60%8.69%
YTD14.05%28.47%19.95%
1 year12.82%34.28%22.69%
3 years30.56%65.26%94.93%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 14:02.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IHT vs TLZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IHT (İş Portföy İhracatçı Şirketler Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and TLZ (Ata Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IHT leads in 4 and TLZ leads in 7. IHT is a Stock Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TLZ is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): IHT leads (−2.54% vs −3.11%). Daily: TLZ leads (1.04% vs 0.34%). 1 week: TLZ leads (0.34% vs −0.40%). 1 month: IHT leads (−5.81% vs −10.23%). 3 months: TLZ leads (−0.23% vs −3.75%). 6 months: TLZ leads (14.60% vs 3.65%). YTD: TLZ leads (28.47% vs 14.05%). 1 year: TLZ leads (34.28% vs 12.82%). 3 years: TLZ leads (65.26% vs 30.56%). Size (TRY): IHT leads (68.3M vs 66.9M). Investors: IHT leads (3,153 vs 801).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IHT returned 14.05% and TLZ returned 28.47%; over the last year IHT returned 12.82% and TLZ returned 34.28%. Over the last month IHT returned −5.81% and TLZ returned −10.23%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IHT has a size of TRY 68.3M with 3,153 investors, while TLZ has a size of TRY 66.9M with 801 investors. IHT leads in size and IHT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IHT is 6 out of 7 and that of TLZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.