IFN vs IHA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IFN (Teb Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Fonu) and IHA (Allbatross Portföy İkinci Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IFN | IHA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.14% | −1.34% | −2.03% |
| Daily | 0.28% | 2.23% | 0.47% |
| 1 week | −0.00% | 1.24% | −0.04% |
| 1 month | −3.69% | −6.17% | −5.83% |
| 3 months | −5.50% | −6.37% | −2.72% |
| 6 months | 5.24% | 1.62% | 8.69% |
| YTD | 14.14% | 14.65% | 19.95% |
| 1 year | 11.05% | 19.53% | 22.69% |
| 3 years | 78.34% | 79.83% | 94.93% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IFN vs IHA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IFN (Teb Portföy Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Fonu) and IHA (Allbatross Portföy İkinci Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IFN leads in 6 and IHA leads in 5. IFN is a Stock Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IHA is a Stock Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi.
Highlights: Today (est.): IFN leads (−1.14% vs −1.34%). Daily: IHA leads (2.23% vs 0.28%). 1 week: IHA leads (1.24% vs 0.00%). 1 month: IFN leads (−3.69% vs −6.17%). 3 months: IFN leads (−5.50% vs −6.37%). 6 months: IFN leads (5.24% vs 1.62%). YTD: IHA leads (14.65% vs 14.14%). 1 year: IHA leads (19.53% vs 11.05%). 3 years: IHA leads (79.83% vs 78.34%). Size (TRY): IFN leads (3.8M vs 2.7M). Investors: IFN leads (395 vs 264).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IFN or IHA?
Year to date IFN returned 14.14% and IHA returned 14.65%; over the last year IFN returned 11.05% and IHA returned 19.53%. Over the last month IFN returned −3.69% and IHA returned −6.17%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IFN or IHA?
As of September 28, 2026, IFN has a size of TRY 3.8M with 395 investors, while IHA has a size of TRY 2.7M with 264 investors. IFN leads in size and IFN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IFN and IHA mean?
The CMB risk score of IFN is 6 out of 7 and that of IHA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.