Yatırımcı.AI

HVZ vs MKA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HVZ (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and MKA (Marmara Capital Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) side by side.

HVZMKA
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

HVZ vs MKA Fund Comparison
MetricHVZMKACategory median
Today (est.)−2.09%−2.65%−2.59%
Daily0.11%0.82%0.47%
1 week−0.99%0.21%−0.04%
1 month−4.35%−9.76%−5.83%
3 months−8.30%−17.03%−2.72%
6 months1.64%−4.53%8.69%
YTD6.04%3.73%19.95%
1 year9.00%3.63%22.69%
3 years69.91%—94.93%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 11:56.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the HVZ vs MKA comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HVZ (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and MKA (Marmara Capital Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, HVZ leads in 7 and MKA leads in 3. HVZ is a Stock Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; MKA is a Stock Fund fund managed by Marmara Capital Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): HVZ leads (−2.09% vs −2.65%). Daily: MKA leads (0.82% vs 0.11%). 1 week: MKA leads (0.21% vs −0.99%). 1 month: HVZ leads (−4.35% vs −9.76%). 3 months: HVZ leads (−8.30% vs −17.03%). 6 months: HVZ leads (1.64% vs −4.53%). YTD: HVZ leads (6.04% vs 3.73%). 1 year: HVZ leads (9.00% vs 3.63%). Size (TRY): MKA leads (69.1M vs 67.6M). Investors: HVZ leads (1,594 vs 1,544).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date HVZ returned 6.04% and MKA returned 3.73%; over the last year HVZ returned 9.00% and MKA returned 3.63%. Over the last month HVZ returned −4.35% and MKA returned −9.76%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, HVZ has a size of TRY 67.6M with 1,594 investors, while MKA has a size of TRY 69.1M with 1,544 investors. MKA leads in size and HVZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HVZ is 6 out of 7 and that of MKA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.