GUK vs ULH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GUK | ULH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 1.20% | 0.07% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −2.82% | 2.45% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −5.11% | 3.99% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 12.82% | 8.44% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | −0.64% | 19.77% | 12.86% |
| YTD | −6.26% | 21.19% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | — | 28.65% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 233.48% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GUK vs ULH comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, GUK leads in 3 and ULH leads in 5. GUK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ULH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GUK leads (1.20% vs 0.07%). 1 week: ULH leads (2.45% vs −2.82%). 1 month: ULH leads (3.99% vs −5.11%). 3 months: GUK leads (12.82% vs 8.44%). 6 months: ULH leads (19.77% vs −0.64%). YTD: ULH leads (21.19% vs −6.26%). Size (TRY): ULH leads (1.3B vs 1.3B). Investors: GUK leads (2,434 vs 223).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GUK or ULH?
Year to date GUK returned −6.26% and ULH returned 21.19%; over the last year GUK returned — and ULH returned 28.65%. Over the last month GUK returned −5.11% and ULH returned 3.99%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GUK or ULH?
As of September 28, 2026, GUK has a size of TRY 1.3B with 2,434 investors, while ULH has a size of TRY 1.3B with 223 investors. ULH leads in size and GUK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GUK and ULH mean?
The CMB risk score of GUK is 7 out of 7 and that of ULH is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.