Yatırımcı.AI

GHS vs HVS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GHS (Garanti Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and HVS (Hsbc Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) side by side.

GHSHVS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GHS vs HVS Fund Comparison
MetricGHSHVSCategory median
Today (est.)−2.95%−3.06%−2.80%
Daily0.77%0.74%0.47%
1 week0.74%1.15%−0.04%
1 month−5.76%−3.42%−5.83%
3 months−1.31%−1.33%−2.72%
6 months7.14%11.06%8.69%
YTD20.07%26.83%19.95%
1 year24.96%26.37%22.69%
3 years110.23%111.69%94.93%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 13:52.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GHS vs HVS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GHS (Garanti Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and HVS (Hsbc Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 12 metrics compared, GHS leads in 5 and HVS leads in 7. GHS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HVS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Hsbc Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): GHS leads (−2.95% vs −3.06%). Daily: GHS leads (0.77% vs 0.74%). 1 week: HVS leads (1.15% vs 0.74%). 1 month: HVS leads (−3.42% vs −5.76%). 3 months: GHS leads (−1.31% vs −1.33%). 6 months: HVS leads (11.06% vs 7.14%). YTD: HVS leads (26.83% vs 20.07%). 1 year: HVS leads (26.37% vs 24.96%). 3 years: HVS leads (111.69% vs 110.23%). Size (TRY): GHS leads (2.7B vs 2.4B). Investors: GHS leads (14,814 vs 9,272). Risk: HVS leads (0 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GHS returned 20.07% and HVS returned 26.83%; over the last year GHS returned 24.96% and HVS returned 26.37%. Over the last month GHS returned −5.76% and HVS returned −3.42%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GHS has a size of TRY 2.7B with 14,814 investors, while HVS has a size of TRY 2.4B with 9,272 investors. GHS leads in size and GHS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GHS is 6 out of 7 and that of HVS is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.