Yatırımcı.AI

FJZ vs NBZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FJZ (Fiba Portföy Fırtına Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NBZ (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

FJZNBZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FJZ vs NBZ Fund Comparison
MetricFJZNBZCategory median
Daily−0.55%0.06%0.19%
1 week−1.12%0.46%0.42%
1 month−1.81%1.94%0.94%
3 months2.23%6.14%5.89%
6 months10.22%12.32%12.86%
YTD13.15%17.16%18.07%
1 year19.85%23.09%24.44%
3 years127.49%102.48%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FJZ vs NBZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FJZ (Fiba Portföy Fırtına Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NBZ (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FJZ leads in 4 and NBZ leads in 7. FJZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NBZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NBZ leads (0.06% vs −0.55%). 1 week: NBZ leads (0.46% vs −1.12%). 1 month: NBZ leads (1.94% vs −1.81%). 3 months: NBZ leads (6.14% vs 2.23%). 6 months: NBZ leads (12.32% vs 10.22%). YTD: NBZ leads (17.16% vs 13.15%). 1 year: NBZ leads (23.09% vs 19.85%). 3 years: FJZ leads (127.49% vs 102.48%). Size (TRY): FJZ leads (1.3B vs 1.3B). Investors: FJZ leads (720 vs 193). Risk: FJZ leads (0 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FJZ returned 13.15% and NBZ returned 17.16%; over the last year FJZ returned 19.85% and NBZ returned 23.09%. Over the last month FJZ returned −1.81% and NBZ returned 1.94%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FJZ has a size of TRY 1.3B with 720 investors, while NBZ has a size of TRY 1.3B with 193 investors. FJZ leads in size and FJZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FJZ is 0 out of 7 and that of NBZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.