Yatırımcı.AI

FIU vs MHM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIU (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHM (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

FIUMHM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FIU vs MHM Fund Comparison
MetricFIUMHMCategory median
Daily0.57%0.26%0.32%
1 week1.73%0.65%0.42%
1 month−2.53%2.66%−1.48%
3 months6.35%9.71%4.48%
6 months21.95%22.07%14.82%
YTD36.53%31.96%25.33%
1 year39.31%45.77%35.72%
3 years143.70%254.26%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FIU vs MHM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIU (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHM (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIU leads in 5 and MHM leads in 6. FIU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MHM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FIU leads (0.57% vs 0.26%). 1 week: FIU leads (1.73% vs 0.65%). 1 month: MHM leads (2.66% vs −2.53%). 3 months: MHM leads (9.71% vs 6.35%). 6 months: MHM leads (22.07% vs 21.95%). YTD: FIU leads (36.53% vs 31.96%). 1 year: MHM leads (45.77% vs 39.31%). 3 years: MHM leads (254.26% vs 143.70%). Size (TRY): FIU leads (84.3M vs 83.7M). Investors: FIU leads (1,036 vs 677). Risk: MHM leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FIU returned 36.53% and MHM returned 31.96%; over the last year FIU returned 39.31% and MHM returned 45.77%. Over the last month FIU returned −2.53% and MHM returned 2.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FIU has a size of TRY 84.3M with 1,036 investors, while MHM has a size of TRY 83.7M with 677 investors. FIU leads in size and FIU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIU is 5 out of 7 and that of MHM is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.