DKL vs IMF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DKL (Deniz Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | DKL | IMF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.36% | −1.68% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 1.60% | −1.53% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 5.78% | 4.28% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 12.65% | 10.17% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 15.90% | 10.24% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 21.58% | 24.27% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 98.52% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the DKL vs IMF comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DKL (Deniz Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DKL leads in 8 and IMF leads in 2. DKL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; IMF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DKL leads (0.11% vs 0.10%). 1 week: DKL leads (0.36% vs −1.68%). 1 month: DKL leads (1.60% vs −1.53%). 3 months: DKL leads (5.78% vs 4.28%). 6 months: DKL leads (12.65% vs 10.17%). YTD: DKL leads (15.90% vs 10.24%). 1 year: IMF leads (24.27% vs 21.58%). Size (TRY): IMF leads (378.7M vs 378.1M). Investors: DKL leads (101 vs 19). Risk: DKL leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, DKL or IMF?
Year to date DKL returned 15.90% and IMF returned 10.24%; over the last year DKL returned 21.58% and IMF returned 24.27%. Over the last month DKL returned 1.60% and IMF returned −1.53%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DKL or IMF?
As of September 28, 2026, DKL has a size of TRY 378.1M with 101 investors, while IMF has a size of TRY 378.7M with 19 investors. IMF leads in size and DKL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DKL and IMF mean?
The CMB risk score of DKL is 3 out of 7 and that of IMF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.