Yatırımcı.AI

CHM vs URA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHM (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and URA (Ata Portföy Enerji Değişken Fon) side by side.

CHMURA
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

CHM vs URA Fund Comparison
MetricCHMURACategory median
Daily0.42%−0.12%0.32%
1 week0.01%−2.62%0.42%
1 month−3.63%−12.70%−1.48%
3 months3.61%−1.73%4.48%
6 months11.46%0.68%14.82%
YTD22.40%15.97%25.33%
1 year35.22%13.59%35.72%
3 years164.04%—161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the CHM vs URA comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CHM (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and URA (Ata Portföy Enerji Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, CHM leads in 8 and URA leads in 1. CHM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; URA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CHM leads (0.42% vs −0.12%). 1 week: CHM leads (0.01% vs −2.62%). 1 month: CHM leads (−3.63% vs −12.70%). 3 months: CHM leads (3.61% vs −1.73%). 6 months: CHM leads (11.46% vs 0.68%). YTD: CHM leads (22.40% vs 15.97%). 1 year: CHM leads (35.22% vs 13.59%). Size (TRY): CHM leads (502.5M vs 501.8M). Investors: URA leads (7,506 vs 5,075).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date CHM returned 22.40% and URA returned 15.97%; over the last year CHM returned 35.22% and URA returned 13.59%. Over the last month CHM returned −3.63% and URA returned −12.70%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, CHM has a size of TRY 502.5M with 5,075 investors, while URA has a size of TRY 501.8M with 7,506 investors. CHM leads in size and URA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CHM is 6 out of 7 and that of URA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.