Yatırımcı.AI

BVZ vs NTB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVZ (Bv Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and NTB (Azimut Portföy Avşar Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) side by side.

BVZNTB
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

BVZ vs NTB Fund Comparison
MetricBVZNTBCategory median
Today (est.)—−1.25%−1.86%
Daily0.23%0.45%0.19%
1 week0.63%0.70%0.42%
1 month2.94%−1.45%0.94%
3 months9.82%−1.04%5.89%
6 months21.53%11.46%12.86%
YTD33.36%26.55%18.07%
1 year46.89%22.65%24.44%
3 years289.45%79.10%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 12:44.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the BVZ vs NTB comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVZ (Bv Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and NTB (Azimut Portföy Avşar Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BVZ leads in 8 and NTB leads in 3. BVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Bv Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NTB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NTB leads (0.45% vs 0.23%). 1 week: NTB leads (0.70% vs 0.63%). 1 month: BVZ leads (2.94% vs −1.45%). 3 months: BVZ leads (9.82% vs −1.04%). 6 months: BVZ leads (21.53% vs 11.46%). YTD: BVZ leads (33.36% vs 26.55%). 1 year: BVZ leads (46.89% vs 22.65%). 3 years: BVZ leads (289.45% vs 79.10%). Size (TRY): NTB leads (3.2B vs 3.1B). Investors: BVZ leads (464 vs 1). Risk: BVZ leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date BVZ returned 33.36% and NTB returned 26.55%; over the last year BVZ returned 46.89% and NTB returned 22.65%. Over the last month BVZ returned 2.94% and NTB returned −1.45%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BVZ has a size of TRY 3.1B with 464 investors, while NTB has a size of TRY 3.2B with 1 investors. NTB leads in size and BVZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVZ is 2 out of 7 and that of NTB is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.